Комплексная визуализация переднего сегмента глаза в диагностике, мониторинге и лечении болезни закрытого угла

Авторы

  • Г.А. Шарова ООО «Глазная клиника доктора Беликовой», Москва
  • Н.И. Курышева Медико-биологический университет инноваций и непрерывного образования ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «Федера льный биофизический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА России, Москва; Консультативно-диагностический отдел Центра офтальмологии ФМБА России, ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «ФМБЦ им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА, Москва; Кафедра офтальмологии АПО ФГБУ ФНКЦ ФМБА России, Москва

Ключевые слова:

первичное закрытие угла, первичная закрытоугольная глаукома, оптическая когерентная томография, ультразвуковая биомикроскопия

Аннотация

Цель. Обзор литературных данных, посвященных роли визуализации переднего сегмента глаза в диагностике, мониторинге и лечении болезни первичного закрытого угла. Представлен анализ результатов применения современных технических устройств – оптической когерентной томографии переднего отрезка (AS-OST), ультразвуковой биомикроскопии, Шаймпфлюг-камеры, оценка преимуществ и недостатков в сравнении с гониоскопией. Визуализация структур переднего сегмента глаза представляет собой важную часть стратегии, направленной на решение проблемы выявления факторов риска, диагностику, мониторинг и оценку эффективности лечения болезней первичного закрытия угла. Качественный и количественный анализ данных на основе оптической когерентной томографии, ультразвуковой биомикроскопии, данных Шаймпфлюг-камеры подтверждает высокую сопоставимость с гониоскопией, однако каждый из методов дополняет друг друга.
Заключение. Визуализация переднего сегмента глаза является эталоном в современной диагностике и оценке эффективности лечения болезней первичного закрытия угла. Мультимодальная визуализация повышает возможности точной диагностики и правильного выбора тактики лечения.

Библиографические ссылки

Tham Y.C., Li X., Wong T.Y. et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(11): 2081-2090.

Friedman D.S., Foster P.J., Aung T., He M. Angle closure and angle-closure glaucoma: what we are doing now and what we will be doing in the future. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2012; 40(4): 381-387.

Foster P.J., Buhrmann R., Quigley H.A., Johnson G.J. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002; 86(2): 238-242.

Aptel F., Chiquet C., Beccat S., Denis P. Biometric evaluation of anterior chamber changes after physiologic pupil dilation using Pentacam and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012; 53(7): 4005-4010.

Sun X., Dai Y., Chen Y. et al. Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don’t know. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2017; 57: 26-45.

Varma D.K., Simpson S.M., Rai A.S., Ahmed I.K. Undetected angle closure in patients with a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 52(4): 373-378.

Varma D.K., Kletke S.N., Rai A.S., Ahmed I.K. Proportion of undetected narrow angles or angle closure in cataract surgery referrals. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 52(4): 366-372.

Quigley H.A., Friedman D.S., Hahn S.R. Evaluation of practice patterns for the care of open-angle glaucoma compared with claims data: the Glaucoma Adherence and Persistency Study. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(9): 1599-1606.

Hertzog L.H., Albrecht K.G., LaBree L., Lee P.P. Glaucoma care and conformance with preferred practice patterns. Examination of the private, communitybased ophthalmologist. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103(7): 1009-1013.

Zebardast N., Solus J.F., Quigley H.A. et al. Comparison of resident and glaucoma faculty practice patterns in the care of openangle glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015; 15: 41.

Sakata L.M., Lavanya R., Friedman D.S. et al. Comparison of gonioscopy and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography in detecting angle closure in different quadrants of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(5): 769-774.

Campbell P., Redmond T., Agarwal R. et al. Repeatability and comparison of clinical techniques for anterior chamber angle assessment. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2015; 35(2): 170-178.

Radhakrishnan S., Goldsmith J., Huang D. et al. Comparison of optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy for detection of narrow anterior chamber angles. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2005; 123(8): 1053-1059.

Sakata L.M., Lavanya R., Friedman D.S. et al. Assessment of the scleral spur in anterior segment optical coherence tomography images. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2008; 126(2): 181-185.

Nolan W.P., See J.L., Chew P.T. et al. Detection of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(1): 33-39

Wirbelauer C., Karandish A., Häberle H., Pham D.T. Noncontact goniometry with optical coherence tomography. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2005; 123(2): 179-185.

Lavanya R., Foster P.J., Sakata L.M. et al. Screening for narrow angles in the singapore population: evaluation of new noncontact screening methods. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(10): 1720-1727.

Pekmezci M., Porco T.C, Lin S.C. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography as a screening tool for the assessment of the anterior segment angle. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging. 2009; 40(4): 389-398.

Wong H.T., Chua J.L., Sakata L.M. et al. Comparison of slitlamp optical coherence tomography and scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer to evaluate angle closure in Asian eyes. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2009; 127(5): 599-603.

Narayanaswamy A., Sakata L.M., He M.G. et al. Diagnostic performance of anterior chamber angle measurements for detecting eyes with narrow angles: an anterior segment OCT study. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2010; 128(10): 1321-1327.

Grewal D.S., Brar G.S., Jain R., Grewal S.P. Comparison of Scheimpflug imaging and spectral domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography for detection of narrow anterior chamber angles. Eye (Lond). 2011; 25(5): 603-611.

Nongpiur M.E., Haaland B.A., Friedman D.S. et al. Classification algorithms based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurements for detection of angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(1): 48-54.

Dabasia P.L., Edgar D.F. et al. Noncontact Screening Methods for the Detection of Narrow Anterior Chamber Angles. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015; 56(6): 3929-3935.

Melese E.K., Chan J.D., Blieden L.S. et al. Determination and Validation of Thresholds of Anterior Chamber Parameters by Dedicated Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016; 169: 208-217.

Chansangpetch S., Rojanapongpun P., Lin S.C. Anterior Segment Imaging for Angle Closure. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2018; 188.

Razeghinejad M.R., Myers J.S. Contemporary approach to the diagnosis and management of primary angle-closure disease. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2018; 63(6): 754-768.

Архипова А.Н., Туркина К.И. Объективная оценка угла передней камеры в здоровых глазах с помощью оптической когерентной томографии. Офтальмологические ведомости. 2017; 10(3): 18–21.

Huang G., Gonzalez E., Lee R. et al. Association of biometric factors with anterior chamber angle widening and intraocular pressure reduction after uneventful phacoemulsification for cataract. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2012; 38(1): 108-116.

Huang G., Gonzalez E., Peng P.H. et al. Anterior chamber depth, iridocorneal angle width, and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification: narrow vs open iridocorneal angles. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2011; 129(10): 1283-1290.

Moghimi S., Chen R., Johari M. et al. Changes in Anterior Segment Morphology After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Acute Primary Angle Closure. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016; 166: 133-140.

Friedman D.S., Aung T. Changes in anterior segment morphology after laser peripheral iridotomy: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(7): 1383-1387.

Yoong Leong J.C., O’Connor J. et al. Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Changes to the Anterior Chamber Angle in the Short-term following Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty. J. Curr. Glaucoma Pract. 2014; 8(1): 1-6.

Lee R.Y., Kasuga T., Cui Q.N. et al. Association between baseline iris thickness and prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy outcomes in primary angle-closure suspects Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(6): 1194-1202.

Lee R.Y., Kasuga T., Cui Q.N et al. Association between baseline angle width and induced angle opening following prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013; 54(5): 3763-3770.

Ang B.C., Nongpiur M.E., Aung T. et al. Changes in Japanese eyes after laser peripheral iridotomy: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2016; 44(3): 159-165.

Zebardast N., Kavitha S., Krishnamurthy P. et al. Changes in Anterior Segment Morphology and Predictors of Angle Widening after Laser Iridotomy in South Indian Eyes. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(12): 2519-2526.

Sung K.R., Lee K.S., Hong J.W. Baseline Anterior Segment Parameters Associated with the Long-term Outcome of Laser Peripheral Iridotomy. Curr. Eye Res. 2015; 40(11): 1128-1133.

Baskaran M., Ho S.W., Tun T.A. et al. Assessment of circumferential angle-closure by the iris-trabecular contact index with swept-source optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(11): 2226-2231.

Lai I., Mak H., Lai G. et al. Anterior chamber angle imaging with swept-source optical coherence tomography: measuring peripheral anterior synechia in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(6): 1144-1149.

Tun T.A., Baskaran M., Perera S.A. et al. Swept-source optical coherence tomography assessment of iris-trabecular contact after phacoemulsification with or without goniosynechialysis in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2015; 99(7): 927-931.

Shabana N., Aquino M.C., See J. et al. Quantitative evaluation of anterior chamber parameters using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in primary angle closure mechanisms. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2012; 40(8): 792-801.

Nongpiur M.E., He M., Amerasinghe N. et al. Lens vault, thickness, and position in Chinese subjects with angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(3): 474-479.

Wu R.Y., Nongpiur M.E., He M.G. et al. Association of narrow angles with anterior chamber area and volume measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2011; 129(5): 569-574.

Nongpiur M.E., Sakata L.M. et al. Novel association of smaller anterior chamber width with angle closure in Singaporeans. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(10): 1967-1973.

Atalay E., Nongpiur M.E., Baskaran M. Biometric Factors Associated With Acute Primary Angle Closure: Comparison of the Affected and Fellow Eye. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 2016; 57(13): 5320-5325.

Maslin J.S., Barkana Y., Dorairaj S.K. Anterior segment imaging in glaucoma: An updated review. Indian. J. Ophthalmol. 2015; 63(8): 630 640.

He M., Foster P.J., Johnson G.J., Khaw P.T. Angle-closure glaucoma in East Asian and European people. Different diseases? Eye (Lond). 2006; 20(1): 3-12.

Ursea R., Silverman R.H. Anteriorsegment imaging for assessment of glaucoma. Expert. Rev. Ophthalmol. 2010; 1; 5(1): 59-74.

Pavlin C.J., Ritch R., Foster F.S. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in plateau iris syndrome. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1992; 113(4): 390-395.

Jiang Y., He M. et al. Qualitative assessment of ultrasound biomicroscopic images using standard photographs: the liwan eye study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010; 51(4): 2035-2042.

Barkana Y. et al. Agreement between gonioscopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy in detecting iridotrabecular apposition. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007; 125(10):1331-1335.

Grewal D.S., Brar G.S., Jain R., Grewal S.P. Comparison of Scheimpflug imaging and spectral domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography for detection of narrow anterior chamber angles. Eye (Lond). 2011; 25(5): 603-611.

Hong X.J. et al. Progress in anterior chamber angle imaging for glaucoma risk prediction – A review on clinical equipment, practice and research. Med. Eng. Phys. 2016; 38(12): 1383-1391.

Загрузки

Опубликован

2022-09-09